Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner, v. Raytheon Company, Respondent.international Union of Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers, Afl-cio, Petitioner, v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent, Andraytheon Company, Intervenor
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. - 408 F.2d 681
February 19, 1969 Rehearing Denied May 8, 1969
John I. Taylor, Jr. (argued), Washington, D. C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
Alfred C. Phillips (argued), Paul B. Ascher, Lexington, Mass., for respondent Raytheon Co.
Irving Abramson, Ruth Weyand, Washington, D. C., Melvin Warshaw, New York City, for International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers.
Before CHAMBERS, KOELSCH, and BROWNING, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The Board found that Raytheon Company, in connection with a representation election at its Sunnyvale, California plant, committed labor practices made unfair by Section 8(a) (1) of the Act. In No. 22572, the Board petitions for enforcement of its ensuing cease and desist order, and in No. 22572A, the International Union of Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers, AFL-CIO, the charging party and intervenor, petitions for a review of the Board's ruling refusing to amend the Complaint.
During oral argument in this court counsel for Raytheon made a suggestion of mootness. With leave of court, Raytheon was permitted to supplement the record and move the dismissal of the proceedings. From the additional materials submitted pursuant to such leave, it now appears without contradiction that since these petitions were filed the Board has held a new representation election and certified the result.
Accordingly, on the authority of General Engineering, Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 311 F.2d 570 (9th Cir.1962), Raytheon's motions are granted and the proceedings are dismissed.