Case Resources
Search this Case
in
Google Scholar
on the Web
Google
Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo!
Web Search
in the News
Google
News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google
Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google
Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Walter Lee Ervin, Appellant, v. Hoyt C. Cupp, Warden, Appellee
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. - 411 F.2d 990
May 2, 1969
Evelyn N. Scott (argued), Salem, Or., for appellant.
David H. Blunt (argued), Asst. Atty. Gen., Robert Y. Thornton, Atty. Gen., Salem, Or., for appellee.
Before CHAMBERS and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges, and BEEKS, District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
The appeal is dismissed.
This case began with a state conviction. It was affirmed on appeal. State v. Ervin, 241 Or. 475, 406 P.2d 901 (1965).
Next Ervin files in federal district court asserting many points never submitted at any time.
Oregon has post-conviction remedies, but no attempt has been made to use them.
Duty requires us to interfere with state process from time to time, but in this case obviously not yet.