Case Resources
Search this Case
in
Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web
Search
MSN
Web Search
Yahoo! Web
Search
in the News
Google News
Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog
Search
Technorati
Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book
Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Angela Dorothy Gaston, Appellant, v. John Pittman, Appellee
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. - 413 F.2d 1031
July 17, 1969
W. H. F. Wiltshire, of Harrell, Caro, Middlebrooks & Wiltshire, Pensacola, Fla., for appellant.
W. Spencer Mitchem, Beggs, Lane, Daniel, Gaines & Davis, Pensacola, Fla., for appellee.
Before THORNBERRY and AINSWORTH, Circuit Judges, and DAWKINS, District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant instituted this Florida diversity action seeking to recover damages against her former husband for a tort committed by him prior to their marriage. The United States District Court, 285 F.Supp. 645, dismissed the complaint on the ground that appellant's action had been extinguished upon her marriage to the defendant-appellee. On appeal, this Court, pursuant to § 25.031 Florida Statutes 1959, F.S.A., and Rule 4.61, Florida Appellate Rules, 32 F.S.A., certified to the Supreme Court of Florida the following question:
"Whether under Florida law a divorced woman can maintain an action against her former husband for a tort committed by him prior to their marriage."
405 F.2d 869. In a full and clear opinion filed May 28, 1969, 224 So.2d 326, the Supreme Court of Florida answered the certified question in the affirmative. On June 23, 1969, that court denied the petition for rehearing filed by the attorney for the appellee.
Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is reversed and the case remanded for proceedings consistent with the judgment of this Court and with the decision and opinion of the Supreme Court of Florida.
Reversed and remanded.