Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google
Scholar
on the Web
Google Web
Search
MSN Web
Search
Yahoo! Web
Search
in the News
Google News
Search
Google News
Archive Search
Yahoo!
News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com
Search
Google Blog
Search
Technorati Blog
Search
in other Databases
Google Book
Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
United States of America, Appellee, v. Finley Ray Curtis, and William Frank Small, Appellants
United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit. - 416 F.2d 19
Oct. 6, 1969
Rogers W. Kirven, Florence, S.C. (Court-appointed counsel), on Brief for appellants.
Klyde Robinson, U.S. Atty., James H. Fowles, Jr., and William B. Long, Jr., Asst. U.S. Attys., on brief for appellee.
Before SOBELOFF, BRYAN and WINTER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Finley Ray Curtis and William Frank Small were found guilty in the District Court of South Carolina, March 26, 1969, on one count of unlawfully concealing and retaining stolen postal money orders in violation of 18 U.S.C. 641, and on two counts of forging, and two counts of uttering, postal money orders in contravention of 18 U.S.C. 500. On their appeal they attack the validity of the arrest, the search of their automobile, and the seizure of incriminating evidence therein. They likewise question the adequacy of the identification of Small, the admission of certain evidence, and the sufficiency of the proof to convict. On examining each of these assignments of error, we perceive no basis for the appeal and sustain defendants' conviction.
Affirmed.