Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
John J. Burke, Appellant, v. International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Ironshipbuilders, Blacksmiths, Forgers and Helpers,and Local No. 6, Thereof, Appellees
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. - 417 F.2d 1063
Oct. 6, 1969
Richard Gladstein (argued) and Norman Leonard, of Gladstein, Andersen, Leonard & Sibbett, San Francisco Cal., for appellant.
Donald C. Carroll (argued) and Charles P. Scully, San Francisco, Cal., John J. Blake, Kansas City, Kan., for appellees.
Before ELY and CARTER, Circuit Judges, and POWELL, District Judge.*
PER CURIAM:
This appeal is from a judgment of dismissal of appellant's complaint in which he asked for reinstatement in appellee union. His union trial resulted in a finding of guilty and a sentence of indefinite suspension. The trial judge in his able opinion1 detailed the facts and contentions of the parties. We adopt his conclusions and affirm.
Burke was assistant business manager of Local 6 of International Brotherhood of Boilermakers etc., appellee. His and other locals had voted in a referendum on a contract with Pacific Coast ship-builders. Burke claimed there were irregularities in the voting. The contracts had been printed and were ready for delivery.
Burke, without authority but in a good faith attempt to thwart the delivery of the contract until the claimed vote irregularities were investigated, picked up and retained all of the printed copies of the contract. At first he refused to return them. After keeping them for about 24 hours and following some pressure on appellant they were returned.
Appellant was charged by the International with taking the contracts without authority in violation of the International Constitution, Article XVII, Section 1(e), (f), (g), (k) and (l). He was tried by a panel of International officers. The trial court found the union trial (Ex. 21) was not violative of the rights of the appellant as guaranteed by 29 U.S.C. 411(a)(1), (2) and (5). From the record before us we find no basis to conclude that the facts as found were clearly erroneous. (Rule 52 F.R.Civ.P.).
Affirmed.
Burke v. International Bro. of Boilermakers, etc., 302 F.Supp. 1345 (N.D.Cal.1969)