Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google
Scholar
on the Web
Google Web
Search
MSN Web
Search
Yahoo! Web
Search
in the News
Google News
Search
Google News
Archive Search
Yahoo!
News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com
Search
Google Blog
Search
Technorati Blog
Search
in other Databases
Google Book
Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
John Edward Daugherty, Petitioner-appellant, v. Walter E. Craven, Warden, Respondent-appellee
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. - 422 F.2d 6
Jan. 29, 1970Certiorari Denied April 27, 1970See 90 S.Ct. 1509
Before CHAMBERS and ELY, Circuit Judges, and FERGUSON,1 District judge.
PER CURIAM:
The dismissal of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is reversed and the case remanded. The district court must determine whether the ex parte orders revoking probation violated the Sixth Amendment. See Mempa v. Rhay,389 U.S. 128, 88 S.Ct. 254, 19 L.Ed.2d 336 (1967), and McConnell v. Rhay,393 U.S. 2, 89 S.Ct. 32, 21 L.Ed.2d 2 (1968).
From the information before us, it appears that the issue has not been presented to, or considered by, the California courts. The district court may hold the petition in abeyance for a reasonable time in order to afford the California courts the first opportunity to consider the issue. Compare Ney v. Oberhauser, 419 F.2d 828 (9th Cir. 1969).
John E. Daugherty, in pro. per., appellant.
Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen., State of California, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Hon. Warren J. Ferguson, United States District Judge, Los Angeles, California, sitting by designation