Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Patricia Ann Horton et al., Plaintiffs, v. the Lawrence County Board of Education et al., Defendants-appellees, v. National Education Association, Inc., Intervenor-appellant
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. - 425 F.2d 735
May 8, 1970
Fred D. Gray, Solomon S. Seay, Jr., Montgomery, Ala., Oscar W. Adams, Jr., Birmingham, Ala., Norman C. Amaker, New York City, for appellant.
Albert P. Brewer, Decatur, Ala., Reid B. Barnes, Birmingham, Ala., Gene H. Lentz, Decatur, Ala., for appellees.
Before BELL, AINSWORTH and GODBOLD, Circuit Judges:
PER CURIAM:
This is an appeal from denial by the District Judge of a petition by the National Education Association, Inc., to intervene in this school desegregation case.1
The NEA is a nationwide professional association of teachers, and, obviously, it has members of numerous and diverse racial backgrounds, including many members both black and white from the State of Alabama. It is the parent organization of the Alabama Education Association, into which formerly all-white and all black teachers' associations were merged in 1969. NEA's petition to intervene is for the asserted purpose of protecting the rights of black teacher members who may be affected by orders of the District Court concerning faculty matters entered in the process of converting the Lawrence County school system from a racially dual system to a unitary system.
In its denial the District Court observed that it had denied similar motions by groups of white parents and other groups concerned about school desegregation.
The petition does not show such interest in the NEA itself as to entitle it to intervene as a matter of right under Rule 24(a) (2), Fed.R.Civ.P., and we are not able to say that the District Judge erred in denying permissive intervention under Rule 24(b) (2).
Affirmed.
Upon consideration of the record and the brief of appellant, the appellee having filed no brief, we dispose of the case as an extraordinary matter. Rule 2, FRAP