Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google
Scholar
on the Web
Google Web
Search
MSN Web
Search
Yahoo! Web
Search
in the News
Google News
Search
Google
News Archive Search
Yahoo!
News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog
Search
Technorati
Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book
Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Ib Otto Astrup, Petitioner and Appellant, v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, Appellee
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. - 432 F.2d 438
July 8, 1970 Certiorari Granted January 18, 1971
Paul N. Halvonik (argued), San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.
David R. Urdan (argued), Cecil F. Poole, U. S. Atty., David N. Ilchert, Ass't. Director, I. & N. S., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.
Before CHAMBERS, and TRASK, Circuit Judges, and PLUMMER, District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
The decision and order of the district court denying citizenship to Astrup is affirmed. We believe that he is concluded by Lapenieks v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 9 Cir., 389 F.2d 343, cert. den. 391 U.S. 951, 88 S.Ct. 1846, 20 L.Ed.2d 864.
He made a considered decision initially to claim his alienage as a ground for avoiding military service. We believe the situation should be tested as of the time his claim was made.
District Judge PLUMMER dissents for the reasons stated by Judge Duniway in his dissent in Lapenieks.