Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google
Scholar
on the Web
Google Web
Search
MSN Web
Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News
Search
Google News
Archive Search
Yahoo!
News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com
Search
Google Blog
Search
Technorati Blog
Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Bruce Sexton, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Bruce Gibbs and Terry Stephens, Defendants-appellants
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. - 446 F.2d 904
June 1, 1971
J. Bruce Aycock, City Atty., Amarillo, Tex., for defendants-appellants.
Harris E. Lofthus, Amarillo, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before CLARK, Associate Justice,1 and GEWIN and RONEY, Circuit judges.
PER CURIAM:
This is a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. 1983 in which the appellee claims damages for an alleged unlawful arrest and an alleged unlawful search and seizure. After a hearing at which the facts were fully developed, the district court rendered judgment for the appellee. Our review of the record convinces us that the facts found by the district court are supported by substantial evidence and that the legal conclusions reached are supported by the facts as found. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court, Sexton v. Gibbs and Stephens, 320 F.Supp. 134 (N.D.Tex.1970), is affirmed.
Associate Justice, United States Supreme Court (Ret.), sitting by designation