Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive
Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com
Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Charles L. Barnett, Appellant
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. - 448 F.2d 36
September 8, 1971
Ron Bain, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.
Robert L. Meyer, U. S. Atty., David R. Nissen, William R. Hawes, Alan Friedman, Asst. U. S. Attys., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Before CHAMBERS and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and TAYLOR,* District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of conviction in this heroin case is affirmed.
We reject the point that the government should have produced at the trial two government informants. The short and full answer is that no demand was ever made for their production. If such a demand had been made and refused, we could consider the significance thereof. It certainly was not plain error.
Other points raised, we likewise find to be without merit.