Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
No. 71-1485
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. - 452 F.2d 110
Argued Nov. 5, 1971.Decided Dec. 14, 1971
John H. Vernon, III, Burlington, N. C. (Vernon & Vernon, Burlington, N. C., on brief), for appellant.
William L. Osteen, U. S. Atty., for appellee.
Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and WINTER and FIELD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
In a proceeding to forfeit an International Harvester Farmall-Tractor because of its use in violation of the alcoholic beverage tax laws, Graham Production Credit Association (Graham) claimed the vehicle, alleging that it was the holder of a chattel mortgage on the vehicle. It was stipulated that the mortgagor had a reputation of at least five years' duration for dealing in nontaxpaid liquor, that this reputation was known to the A.B.C. Law Enforcement Office for the county of mortgagor's residence, that the reputation was not known to Treasury agents having jurisdiction, and that the reputation was not known to the County Sheriff's office but an inquiry to it would have been referred to the A.B.C. Law Enforcement Office. It was further stipulated that Graham, before becoming mortgagee, made no inquiries of any law enforcement office with respect to the record or reputation of the mortgagor, in compliance with 18 U.S.C.A. Sec. 3617(b).**
For noncompliance with 18 U.S.C.A. Sec. 3617(b), the district court denied Graham's claim, and ordered forfeiture of the vehicle. We agree.
Affirmed.