Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellant, v. William Edwin Chandler, Jr., Defendant-appellee.united States of America, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Marty Jay Martinolich, Defendant-appellee
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. - 452 F.2d 95
Dec. 8, 1971
Robert E. Hauberg, U. S. Atty., E. Donald Strange, Asst. U. S. Atty., Jackson, Miss., for plaintiff-appellant.
Victor Blackwell, Covington, La. (Court-appointed), for defendants-appellees.
Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and INGRAHAM and RONEY, Circuit Judges.
INGRAHAM, Circuit Judge:
This is an appeal by the United States from the dismissal of two criminal indictments.1 Since they raise identical issues, the cases have been consolidated on appeal.
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi dismissed two indictments charging appellees with violations of the Selective Service Act of 1967, 50 U.S.C.A. App. Sec. 462 for failing to perform alternative civilian service. The district court founded its action on the recent Supreme Court decision in Clay v. United States, 403 U.S. 698, 91 S.Ct. 2068, 29 L.Ed.2d 810 (1971). After an examination of that decision and the record below we find no support for this action.
In two recent cases this panel affirmed convictions under the Selective Service Act of 1967, 50 U.S.C.A. App. Sec. 462, against Solomon2 and Walker.3
Reversed and remanded.
The United States is authorized to bring this appeal under the provisions of 18 U.S.C.A. Sec. 3731
United States v. Solomon, 450 F.2d 456 (5th Cir., 1971) [October 8, 1971]
United States v. Walker, 451 F.2d 1325 (5th Cir., 1971) [November 18, 1971]