Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google
Scholar
on the Web
Google Web
Search
MSN Web
Search
Yahoo! Web
Search
in the News
Google News
Search
Google News
Archive Search
Yahoo!
News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com
Search
Google Blog
Search
Technorati Blog
Search
in other Databases
Google Book
Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Orville Alvin Kozloski, Defendant-appellant
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. - 453 F.2d 889
Dec. 17, 1971
Paul H. Lamboley, Reno, Nev., for defendant-appellant.
Bart M. Schouweiler, U. S. Atty., Raymond B. Little, Asst. U. S. Atty., Reno, Nev., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before MERRILL, BROWNING and CHOY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from a judgment of conviction of interstate transportation of a stolen motor vehicle in violation of 18 U.S.C. Secs. 2 and 2312. He contends that the District Court abused its discretion by refusing to grant his motion for severance and separate trial under Rule 14 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. At the hearing on his motion appellant argued, without the support of any evidence, that he would be prejudiced at trial by the generally poor quality of his codefendant as a witness and because a hostility had developed between the codefendant and himself. We find no abuse of discretion in denying the motion.
After the trial appellant filed a motion for new trial based in part on the allegation that he had indeed been prejudiced because of these factors. We find neither prejudice nor error.
Affirmed.