Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google
Scholar
on the Web
Google Web
Search
MSN Web
Search
Yahoo! Web
Search
in the News
Google News
Search
Google
News Archive Search
Yahoo!
News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog
Search
Technorati
Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book
Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Ruth Louise Williams and Edward Smith, Plaintiffs-appellees, v. Agnes Bambauer, Defendant-appellant
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. - 455 F.2d 160
Feb. 10, 1972
Frank S. Thackston, Jr., Frank W. Hunger, Lake, Tindall & Hunger, Greenville, Miss., for defendant-appellant.
Fountain D. Dawson, Greenville, Miss., Francis S. Bowling, William F. Coleman, Jackson, Miss., for plaintiffs-appellees.
Before BELL, DYER and CLARK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
This appeal involves judgments rendered after a non-jury trial of two consolidated diversity suits for damages arising out of the same automobile accident. The opinion of the district court contains the findings of fact and conclusions of law and is reported. Williams v. Bambauer, N.D.Miss.1971, 325 F.Supp. 716. The findings of fact are not clearly erroneous, nor does any error in law appear. The judgments are therefore due to be and they are
Affirmed.
* Rule 18, 5 Cir.; See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409.