Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google
Scholar
on the Web
Google Web
Search
MSN Web
Search
Yahoo! Web
Search
in the News
Google News
Search
Google
News Archive Search
Yahoo!
News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog
Search
Technorati
Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book
Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
United States of America, Appellant, v. Joseph Michael Pastore and Frank Paul De Angelis, Appellees
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. - 456 F.2d 99
Argued Jan. 10, 1972.Decided Feb. 28, 1972
David G. Trager, Asst. U. S. Atty., E. D. N. Y. (Robert A. Morse, U. S. Atty., E. D. N. Y., and Edward R. Korman, Asst. U. S. Atty., of counsel), for appellant.
Nathan Kestnbaum, New York City, for appellee Pastore.
H. Elliot Wales, New York City, for appellee De Angelis.
Before MEDINA, KAUFMAN and TIMBERS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The government asks us to overrule our recent decision in United States v. Price, 447 F.2d 23, 29 (2d Cir. 1971), holding that a defendant charged with possession of stolen goods ipso facto has standing to move for suppression of evidence seized in violation of the fourth amendment.
We all agree that we should follow the Price decision which decided this issue and which followed Jones v. United States, 362 U.S. 257, 80 S.Ct. 725, 4 L.Ed.2d 697 (1960). The Supreme Court has granted certiorari to the Sixth Circuit in United States v. Combs, 446 F.2d 515 (6th Cir. 1971), and will consider the precise issue. Judge Medina is of the view that the facts in the case we are now deciding seem to be stronger for the government's position than those in Combs, and that he believes Jones is distinguishable.
Affirmed.