Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google
Scholar
on the Web
Google Web
Search
MSN Web
Search
Yahoo! Web
Search
in the News
Google News
Search
Google
News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog
Search
Technorati
Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book
Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
United States of America, Appellee, v. Gary Bush, Appellant
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. - 459 F.2d 68
Submitted March 29, 1972.Decided April 4, 1972
Harry Fractenberg, New York City, for appellant.
Robert A. Morse, U. S. Atty., E. D. N. Y., Raymond J. Dearie, David G. Trager and Thomas P. Puccio, Asst. U. S. Attys., for appellee.
Before SMITH, FEINBERG and MULLIGAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant Gary Bush appeals from a judgment of conviction for armed bank robbery, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2113(a), (d), and for conspiracy to commit the robbery, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 371. He was tried before Judge Orrin G. Judd and a jury in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, together with four co-defendants, one of whom, Michael C. Fisher, was found guilty along with Bush. Both were sentenced to 25 years imprisonment and both have appealed, but Bush's appeal was severed. On February 14, 1972, this court affirmed the conviction of Fisher. United States v. Fisher, 455 F.2d 1101 (1972).
Our earlier decision contains the basic facts of this case as well as a discussion of most of the legal issues presented for review. To the extent that decision is applicable to the present appeal, we adhere to it. Bush raises several additional issues, including claims that his confession was involuntary and that his parents could not properly have consented to the search of a third-floor bedroom in their house.1 We find these two arguments, as well as the others now pressed, to be without merit and affirm Bush's conviction.
Judgment affirmed.
The search produced a shotgun that was admitted into evidence