Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Alfred L. Mcmicking, Petitioner-appellee, v. Lt. Col. Jack A. Metcalf, Commanding Officer, Armed Forcesexamining and Entrance Station, Oakland,california, Stanley R. Resor Assecretary of the Army of Theunited States,respondents-appellants
United States Court of Appeals, - 462 F.2d 129
Richard F. Locke, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), James L. Browning, U. S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for respondents-appellants.
Anthony F. Granucci (argued), of Thelen, Marrin, Johnson & Bridges, San Francisco, Cal., Robert L. Henn, of Angell, Adams & Holmes, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner-appellee.
Before CHAMBERS and BROWNING, Circuit Judges, and SHARP,* District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
There is sufficient evidence in the record to support the finding that the notification of classification was not mailed to petitioner "as soon as practicable." 32 C.F.R. 1623.4(a). The trial court found this prejudiced the petitioner. Thus, we cannot find that it acted improperly in ordering his release from the Army. See Knox v. United States, 200 F.2d 398 (9th Cir. 1952).
The order appealed from is affirmed.