Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
In the Matter of Clyde R. James, Bankrupt.in the Matter of Michael W. Cedor, Bankrupt.james H. Riggs, Trustee and Appellant, v. Clyde R. James, Bankrupt and Appellee.edward M. Walsh, Trustee and Appellant, v. Michael W. Cedor, Bankrupt and Appellee
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. - 470 F.2d 996
Dec. 22, 1972
Burton I. Meyer (argued), of Glicksberg, Kushner & Goldberg, Harvey W. Hoffman, San Francisco, Cal., Robert R. Barton, Oakland, Cal., for appellants.
Thomas R. Adams (argued), Peter H. Reid, Ralph L. Jacobson, Legal Aid Society of San Mateo County, Daly City, Cal., Hansen, Jaffe & Weiss, San Francisco, Cal., for appellees.
Lynn Anderson Koller, (argued), of Newmark & Koller, Lafayette, Cal., for amicus curiae.
Before BARNES, KOELSCH and ELY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The challenged Orders of the District Court are affirmed upon the authority of Lines v. Frederick, 400 U.S. 18, 91 S.Ct. 113, 27 L.Ed.2d 124 (1970), and the carefully reasoned opinion of District Judge Wollenberg. In re Cedor, 337 F. Supp. 1103 (D.C.N.D.Cal.1972).
We cannot see that our opinion in any way conflicts with In re Aveni, 458 F.2d 972 (6th Cir. 1972). There, a clearly different problem was presented.