Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
David O'reilly, Petitioner, v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent, Andinternational Association of Machinists Andaerospace Workers, Afl-cio, Local Lodge
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. - 472 F.2d 426
Dec. 8, 1972
J. Richard Thesing (argued), San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner.
Joseph E. Mayer, Atty. (argued), Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, Washington D. C., Roy O. Hoffman, Director, Region 20, NLRB, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent.
Bernard Dunau (argued), Louis Poulton, Plato E. Papps, Washington, D. C., Robert Morgan, of Morgan, Beauzay & Hammer, San Jose, Cal., for intervenor.
Before CHAMBERS and BROWNING, Circuit Judges, and SHARP,* District Judge.
SHARP, District Judge:
This case, heard by this Court in a consolidated hearing with Morton Salt Company v. National Labor Relations Board and International Association of Machinists, Oakland Lodge No. 284, International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO, 472 F.2d 416 (9th Cir., 1972), involves the single issue of whether or not the National Labor Relations Board should consider the reasonableness of the amount of fines imposed by a union upon its members for violation of its internal rules. The Board concluded that this was not its function. For the reasons stated in Morton Salt Company v. National Labor Relations Board, et al., supra, filed this date, we disagree and therefore reverse and remand to the Board for further proceedings.
Circuit Judge BROWNING would enforce the Board's order for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Morton Salt Company v. National Labor Relations Board, supra.