Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner, v. International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union Localno. 8, Respondent, Waterway Terminals Company, Intervenor
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. - 473 F.2d 15
Jan. 30, 1973
Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliot Moore, Stanley R. Zirkin, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D. C., Robert J. Wiener, Director, Sub-Region 36, N.L.R.B., Portland, Or., for petitioner.
Frank Pozzi, Raymond Conboy, of Pozzi, Wilson & Atchison, Portland, Or., for respondent.
Lewis K. Scott, of McCulloch, Dezendorf, Spears & Lubersky, Portland, Or., for intervenor.
Before KOELSCH and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges, and NEILL, District Judge.*
PER CURIAM:
The National Labor Relations Board petitions for enforcement of its order finding that International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union Local No. 8 (Local 8) picketed the premises of Waterway Terminals Company (Waterway) with an object of securing recognition, in violation of Sec. 8(b)(7)(A) of the National Labor Relations Act. The Board's decision and order, requiring that Local 8 cease and desist from further picketing, are reported at 193 NLRB No. 65. The underlying dispute between these parties has been before this court in another context. Waterway Terminals Co. v. N. L. R. B., 467 F.2d 1011 (9th Cir. 1972).
The issue before the Board revolved around conflicting versions of what transpired at a meeting between representatives of Local 8 and Waterway on November 2, 1970. Local 8 excepted before the Board and now before us to the credibility resolutions made by the Trial Examiner. We do not disturb credibility resolutions "unless a clear preponderance of all the relevant evidence convinces that they are incorrect." N. L. R. B. v. Luisi Truck Lines, 384 F.2d 842, 846 (9th Cir. 1967). We have carefully examined the record and have found no reason to reverse the credibility findings.
The petition for enforcement is granted.