Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
R. L. Luckett, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Joe Spivy, Etc., et al., Defendants, Marcus Gordon, Etc.,and Thomas D. Lee, Etc., Defendants-appellees.no. 73-3147 Summary Calendar.**rule 18, 5 Cir., See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431f.2d 409
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. - 490 F.2d 87
Feb. 28, 1974
John L. Walker, Hermel Johnson, Jackson, Miss., Lewis Myers, Jr., Oxford, Miss., for plaintiff-appellant.
A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., William A. Allain, Asst. Atty. Gen., J. Marshall Lusk, Jr., P. Roger Googe, Jr., Sp. Asst. Attys. Gen., Jackson, Miss., for defendants-appellees.
Roy Noble Lee, Forest, Miss., for Derrick, Harrell, Spivy.
Travis Buckley, Laurel, Miss., for Derrick, Western Sur.
Before BELL, SIMPSON and MORGAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The entry of judgment in the within matter adjudicated the liabilities of fewer than all of the parties in and to the litigation. There has been no entry of final judgment by the district court upon an express determination that there is no just reason for delay as is required by Rule 54(b), F.R.Civ.Procedure. Hence, the judgment lacks the requisite finality to be appealable within the meaning of 28 U.S.C.A. 1291. International Harvester Credit Corporation v. Belding, 5 Cir., 1972, 462 F.2d 624; Bailey v. Rowan Drilling Company, 5 Cir., 1971, 441 F.2d 57; Cook v. Eizenman, 5 Cir., 1963, 312 F.2d 134.
Dismissed.