Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Olympic Foundry Company, a Washington Corporation, Plaintiff-appellee, v. United States of America, Defendant-appellant
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. - 493 F.2d 1247
Jan. 29, 1974
Scott P. Carmpton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tax Div., Darrell D. Hallett, Trial Atty., Meyer Rothwacks, Thomas L. Stapleton, Richard Farber, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Tax Div., Washington, D.C., Charles W. Billinghurst, Asst. U.S. Atty., Stan Pitkin, U.S. Atty., Tacoma, Wash., for defendant-appellant.
Gerald R. Hergert, of Trethewey & Brink, Seattle, Wash., for plaintiff-appellee.
OPINION
Before CHAMBERS and SNEED, Circuit Judges, and BURNS,1 District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
The Government seeks to reverse the District Court's holding that where in a preceding year the alternative method of computing corporate income tax provided in Int.Rev.Code of 1954, 1201 is utilized, the excess of the taxpayer's net operating loss deduction carried back from a later year over its ordinary income in such preceding year may be carried forward to succeeding years under Int.Rev.Code of 1954, 172, even though the amount of the net operating loss deduction in said preceding year is less than the sum of the total of taxpayer's ordinary and capital gain income for that year.
This issue has been consistently decided against the Government. Chartier Real Estate Co., 52 T.C. 346 (1969), aff'd, 428 F.2d 474 (1st Cir. 1970); Mutual Assurance Society of Virginian Corp., 32 T.C.M. 839 (1973); Sidney Axelrod, 32 T.C.M. 885 (1973); Naegele v. United States, 73-2 U.S.Tax Cas. P9696.
All of the arguments pressed by the Government in the instant case were rejected by these cases. We adopt the position of the First Circuit, the Tax Court and that of the District Court. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.
Honorable James M. Burns, United States District Judge, District of Oregon, sitting by designation