Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com
Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
United States of America, Appellee, v. Aaron Harold Kenner, Appellant
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. - 508 F.2d 409
Submitted Nov. 25, 1974.Decided Dec. 23, 1974, Certiorari Denied April 14, 1975, See95 S.Ct. 1578
William A. Cosby, Jr., Richmond, Va., on brief for appellant.
Brian P. Gettings, U.S. Atty., and Charles L. Beard, Asst. U.S. Atty., on brief for appellee.
Before RUSSELL, FIELD and WIDENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Aaron Harold Kenner was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. App. 1202(a)(1), which provides criminal penalties for any person who has been convicted of a felony '. . . and who receives, possesses, or transports in commerce of affecting commerce . . . any firearm . . .' On appeal, Kenner does not challenge that he has a valid previous felony conviction, that he had possession of a firearm, or that the government's proof established that the firearm in question had traveled in interstate commerce at some point in time before he possessed it. Kenner asserts, however, that the government offered no proof connecting his possession of the weapon with its interstate transportation. It is also argued the statute is unconstitutional if construed to permit a conviction upon a mere showing that a firearm had, at some undetermined point, traveled in interstate commerce before being possessed by a convicted felon.
We have expressed our view on numerous recent occasions that in a prosecution for violation of 18 U.S.C. App. 1202(a), the government need not establish a nexus between the receipt or possession of a weapon and its movement in interstate commerce. E.g., United States v. Davis (4th Cir. 1974), 498 F.2d 1398; United States v. Jordan (4th Cir. 1974), 502 F.2d 1163; United States v. Mullins (4th Cir. 1973), 476 F.2d 664, cert. denied 414 U.S. 839, 94 S.Ct. 91, 38 L.Ed.2d 75 (1973). We also reiterate our view that the statute is constitutional. United States v. Cabbler (4th Cir. 1970), 429 F.2d 577, cert. denied, 400 U.S. 901, 91 S.Ct. 138, 27 L.Ed.2d 138 (1970).
Accordingly, we dispense with oral argument and affirm.
Affirmed.