Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Vaino Uski, Petitioner-appellant, v. Walter T. Stone, Superintendent, Central Training Facility,soledad, California, the People of the State Ofcalifornia, Respondents-appellees
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. - 523 F.2d 14
Aug. 25, 1975
Vaino Uski, for appellant-in pro per.
Evelle J. Younger, Atty. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., for respondents-appellees.
Before MERRILL and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and SMITH,* District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
This is an appeal from an order denying a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The question presented is whether the district court erred in refusing to consider alleged constitutional violations that occurred in connection with a motion to suppress evidence when proceedings on that motion were followed by a guilty plea. In denying the writ the district court followed this court in Mann v. Smith, 488 F.2d 245 (9th Cir. 1973). Since decision by the district court the Supreme Court, in Lefkowitz v. Newsome, 420 U.S. 283, 95 S.Ct. 886, 43 L.Ed.2d 196 (1975), has required a contrary result in the light of Cal.Penal Code, § 1538.5(m).
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings. In our view appointment of counsel is warranted.