Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google
Scholar
on the Web
Google Web
Search
MSN Web
Search
Yahoo! Web
Search
in the News
Google News
Search
Google News
Archive Search
Yahoo!
News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com
Search
Google Blog
Search
Technorati Blog
Search
in other Databases
Google Book
Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Miguel Rios-talamantes, Petitioner-appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-appellee
- 538 F.2d 94
Miguel Rios Talamantes, pro se.
John E. Clark, U.S. Atty., LeRoy Morgan Jahn, Ronald P. Guyer, Asst. U.S. Attys., San Antonio, Tex., for respondent-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas.
Before COLEMAN, GOLDBERG and GEE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant, Miguel Rios-Talamantes, was indicted on January 18, 1973, for distribution of heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Rios-Talamantes was convicted on a guilty plea.
Rios-Talamantes subsequently petitioned for relief from his sentence in the district court under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. He alleged that his indictment was invalid because it was signed by a "Special Attorney" rather than by the permanent United States Attorney or his assistant. He further alleged that the trial judge failed to address him personally prior to accepting his guilty plea. The district court found both contentions to be meritless and accordingly denied relief.
We have carefully reviewed the briefs and record in this case and find the decision of the district court to be free of error. The denial of relief is
AFFIRMED.