Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web
Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive
Search
Yahoo! News
Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com
Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog
Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Gary L. Milligan, Petitioner-appellant, v. W. T. Stone, Warden, Respondent-appellee
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. - 548 F.2d 878
Jan. 12, 1977
Thomas D. Schaefer (argued), San Diego, Cal., for petitioner-appellant.
Alan S. Meth, Deputy Atty. Gen. (argued), San Diego, Cal., for respondent-appellee.
ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE
Before CHAMBERS and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges, and WHELAN,* District Judge.
Generally, the order dismissing the petition for habeas corpus is affirmed on the basis of the contents thereof. The order is reported, Milligan v. Stone, 424 F.Supp. 1088 (S.D.Cal., entered January 13, 1976).
It should be noted, however, that the district court was under a misapprehension that a state certificate had not been sought for a state appeal. But the decision only alternatively relied upon this mistake.
Further, on the facts here one has to reach far to find a trace of a constitutional question.