Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google
Scholar
on the Web
Google Web
Search
MSN Web
Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News
Search
Google News
Archive Search
Yahoo!
News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com
Search
Google Blog
Search
Technorati Blog
Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Michael T. O'brien, Defendant-appellant
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. - 555 F.2d 136
Argued April 22, 1977.Decided May 12, 1977
William J. Dolan, Joseph E. Fazzano, Hartford, Conn., of counsel, for defendant-appellant.
Peter R. Casey, II, Sp. Atty., U. S. Dept. of Justice (Peter C. Dorsey, U. S. Atty. for the District of Connecticut, New Haven, Conn., of counsel), for plaintiff-appellee.
Before WATERMAN, SMITH and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Michael T. O'Brien appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, M. Joseph Blumenfeld, Judge, following entry of a plea of nolo contendere to charges of violating the federal wagering tax statutes, 26 U.S.C. § 4401 et seq., and 26 U.S.C. § 7203, by failing to pay the special occupational tax imposed under the statutes. Before appellant entered the plea, he moved to dismiss the information on the ground that the statutory scheme of Chapter 35 of the Internal Revenue Code compels disclosure of incriminating information in violation of the fifth amendment right against self-incrimination. O'Brien now appeals from the denial of this motion to dismiss the information on the basis of his facial challenge to the constitutionality of 26 U.S.C. § 4401 et seq.
An identical challenge was recently rejected by this court. United States v. Sahadi, 555 F.2d 23 (2 Cir. 1977). On the basis of the opinion in Sahadi, we affirm.