Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
James Burnett Mckay Laing, Plaintiff-appellant, v. United States of America, John M. Walters, Commissioner Ofinternal Revenue Service, Fulton D. Fields, Districtdirector of Internal Revenue Service, District of Vermont,james R. Perry, Chief of Collection Division, District Ofvermont, Defendants-appellees
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. - 558 F.2d 132
June 27, 1977
Martin G. Weinberg, Crane, Inker & Oteri, Boston, Mass., Duncan Kilmartin, Rexford & Kilmartin, Newport, Vt., for plaintiff-appellant.
Bennet N. Hollander, Robert S. Watkins, Tax. Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., George W. F. Cook, U. S. Atty., Dist. of Vermont, Rutland, Vt., for defendants-appellees.
Before FRIENDLY and TIMBERS, Circuit Judges, and THOMSEN, District Judge.*
PER CURIAM:
The Supreme Court, in its opinion of January 13, 1976, 423 U.S. 161, reversed our judgment of May 2, 1974, 496 F.2d 853, and remanded the case to us for further proceedings in conformity with the opinion of the Supreme Court.
Pursuant to the Supreme Court's mandate which was received by our Court on February 20, 1976, we entered an order on the same date vacating our judgment of May 2, 1974.
Having been recently advised that the parties filed in the district court on July 22, 1976 a stipulation that the action be dismissed, we remand the case to the district court with instructions to enter a judgment in accordance with the opinion of the Supreme Court and giving effect to the stipulation of the parties.
Remanded with instructions.