Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google
News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Robert Pugh and Nathaniel Henderson et al., Plaintiffs-appellants, v. James Rainwater et al., Defendants-appellees
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. - 562 F.2d 362
Oct. 18, 1977
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida; James Lawrence King, Judge.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida, Bruce S. Rogow, Miami, Fla., for plaintiffs-appellants.
Peter L. Nimkoff, Daniel S. Pearson, Louis M. Jepeway, Jr., Miami, Fla., amicus curiae, for Dade County Bar.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Raymond L. Marky, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Fla., Paul H. Zacks, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, Fla., for Sutton, Rainwater, Ferguson, Adair, Snowden & Berkman.
Ralph F. Miles, City Atty., for City of Hialeah, Hialeah, Fla., for Maynard.
Aaron A. Foosaner, Miami Beach, Fla., for Perry.
Joseph Pardo, Miami, Fla., for Segall.
Jack Blumenfeld, Milton Robbins, Asst. State's Attys., Miami, Fla., for Gerstein.
Joseph A. Wanick, City Atty., and Henry Edgar, Asst. City Atty. for Miami Beach, Miami Beach, Fla., for Pomerance.
Alan H. Rothstein, Larry J. Hirsch, Asst. City Atty., for Miami, Montague Rosenberg, Asst. City Atty., Miami, Fla., Paul H. Zacks, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, Fla., for Bernard Garmire.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion August 22, 1977, 5 Cir., 1977, 557 F.2d 1189).
Before BROWN, Chief Judge, THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, MORGAN, CLARK, RONEY, GEE, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY and RUBIN, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.