Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Unpublished Dispositionnotice: Second Circuit Local Rule 0.23 States Unreported Opinions Shall Not Be Cited or Otherwise Used in Unrelated Cases.national Labor Relations Board, Petitioner v. Local 259, United Automobile, Aerospace, and Agriculturalimplement Workers of America, Respondent
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. - 562 F.2d 38
June 3, 1977
Before ANDERSON and MANSFIELD, Circuit Judges, BRIEANT, District Judge.1
MANSFIELD, C.J.
This cause came on to be heard upon the application of the National Labor Relations Board for the enforcement of a certain order issued by it against the Respondent, Local 259, United Automobile, Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, New York, New York, its officers, agents, and representatives on June 30, 1976. The Court heard argument of respective counsel on June 3, 1977, has considered the briefs and transcript of record filed in this cause and at the conclusion of oral argument, handed down its decision enforcing the Board's Order, as modified. In conformity therewith, it is hereby
Ordered and Adjudged by the Court that the Respondent, Local 259, United Automobile, Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, New York, New York, its officers, agents, and representatives, shall:
(a) Demanding of Atherton Cadillac, Inc., the discharge of Anthony Dazzo and conditioning the grant of concessions in bargaining upon compliance with said demand.
(b) In any like or related manner, restraining or coercing the aforesaid Employer in the selection of its representatives for purposes of collective bargaining or the adjustment of grievances.
2. Take the following affirmative action which the Board has found necessary to effectuate the policies of the Act:
(a) Send a written notice to Anthony Dazzo, with a copy to the Employer, stating that it has no objection to his employment or selection as a representative for the purposes of collective bargaining or the adjustment of grievances by the Employer and that it will not question his reemployment or reinstatement.
(b) Make Anthony Dazzo whole for any loss of earnings suffered by reason of its unlawful conduct in the manner provided in the section of the Board's Decision entitled "The Remedy."
(c) Post at its offices at New York, New York, copies of the attached notice marked "Appendix." Copies of said notice on forms provided by the Regional Director for Region 29 (of the National Labor Relations Board, Brooklyn, New York) after being duly signed by the Respondent's authorized representative, shall be posted by the Respondent immediately upon receipt thereof, and be maintained by Respondent for 60 consecutive days thereafter, in conspicuous places, including all places where notices to members are customarily posted. Reasonable steps shall be taken by Respondent to insure that said notices are not altered, defaced, or covered by any other material.
(d) Sign and deliver sufficient copies of said notice to the Regional Director for Region 29 for posting by Atherton Cadillac, Inc., at all locations where notices to its employees are customarily posted, if said Employer is willing to so post.
(e) Notify the aforesaid Regional Director, in writing, within 20 days from the date of this Judgment, what steps the Respondent has taken to comply herewith.
It is further Ordered that costs shall be taxed against the Respondent.
Sitting by designation