Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive
Search
Yahoo! News
Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com
Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog
Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Stanley Kinsman, Defendant-appellee
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. - 573 F.2d 3
April 6, 1978
Theodore Wai Wu, Asst. U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.
Carl E. Stewart (argued), Newport Beach, Cal., for defendant-appellee.
Before BARNES, HUFSTEDLER and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
The Government's petition for rehearing is granted. The opinion heretofore filed is ordered withdrawn. Disposition of the Government's petition for rehearing in this case was deferred pending disposition of United States v. Rodriguez-Gastelum, 569 F.2d 482 (9th Cir. en banc 1978). Upon the authority of Rodriguez-Gastelum, we vacate the order below, and remand the case to the district court for the purpose of the district court's determining the question whether Kinsman waived his right to counsel before he made his inculpatory statements. The district court may, in its discretion, make appropriate findings and issue its order on the present record, or it may conduct a further evidentiary hearing directed to the issue.
Order vacated and cause remanded for further proceedings consistent with the views herein expressed.