Case Resources
Search this Case
in
Google Scholar
on the Web
Google
Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo!
Web Search
in the News
Google
News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google
Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google
Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
United States of America, Appellee, v. Christine Lark, Appellant
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. - 577 F.2d 105
June 16, 1978.As Amended on Denial of Rehearing July 20, 1978
Claudia A. Wilken, Asst. Federal Public Defender, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.
Mark L. Webb, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.
Before CHAMBERS and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges, and KELLEHER, District Judge.*
Appellant failed to object or except to the giving of the Allen instruction. Allen v. United States, 164 U.S. 492, 17 S.Ct. 154, 41 L.Ed. 528 (1896). Our examination of the record convinces us that appellant is in no position to raise the question at this time. The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
Apellant's other contentions: (1) that the judge abused his discretion in failing to interrogate the potential jurors in accordance with her requests, (2) that the government failed to comply with the discovery requirements of Rule 16, F.R.Crim.P., and (3) that the government's failure to disclose to her that it intended to use her statement, in which she disclosed that she knew the combination to her codefendant's suitcase was error, are meritless.