Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Associates Financial Services of America, Inc., Plaintiff-appellant, v. Anthony Robinson and Lillie M. Robinson, Defendants,united States Postal Service, Garnishee-defendant Appellee
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. - 582 F.2d 1
Sept. 25, 1978
Edwin A. Smith, Jr., Baton Rouge, La., for plaintiff-appellant.
Donald L. Beckner, U.S. Atty., Darrell D. White, Asst. U.S. Atty., Baton Rouge, La., Leonard Schaitman, Richard A. Olderman, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana.
Before RONEY, GEE and FAY, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT.
This is a commercial garnishment case which raises the issue of whether the United States Postal Service (USPS), as the statutory successor to the Post Office Department,1 retained the Post Office Department's sovereign immunity from state garnishment proceedings.
The garnishment proceedings in the instant case were begun in the District Court of the State of Louisiana against the USPS. The case was removed to the United States District Court, Middle District of Louisiana, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1442(a) (1970) and 39 U.S.C. § 409(a) (1970). The District Court granted Defendant's motion to quash the writs of garnishment directed against the USPS and the Plaintiff appealed. Subsequently, the Defendant filed a motion to vacate the District Court's judgment.
In view of the Defendant's motion, we join the other Circuits2 and hold that the words "sue and be sued" in the Postal Service Reorganization Act, 39 U.S.C. § 401 (1970), constitute a waiver of immunity and permit garnishment proceedings against the USPS.
IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's motion to vacate the District Court's judgment is granted.
Postal Reorganization Act, § 4(a) 39 U.S.C. § 201 note (1970)
See Beneficial Finance Co. of New York, Inc. v. Dallas, 571 F.2d 125 (2nd Cir. 1978); General Electric Credit Corporation v. Smith, 565 F.2d 291 (4th Cir. 1977); Goodman's Furniture Company v. United States Postal Service, 561 F.2d 462 (3rd Cir. 1977); May Department Stores Co. v. Williamson, 549 F.2d 1147 (8th Cir. 1977); Standard Oil v. Starks, 528 F.2d 201 (7th Cir. 1975)