Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive
Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
In Re Charge of Judicial Misconduct
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. - 595 F.2d 517
April 19, 1979
BROWNING, Chief Judge:
A complaint of misconduct has been lodged against a district judge of this circuit. Administrative consideration of such complaints is governed by the Procedures for Processing Complaints of Judicial Misconduct, adopted by the Judicial Council of this circuit on November 10, 1978. See In re Charge of Judicial Misconduct, 593 F.2d 879 (9th Cir. 1979).
The complaint alleges that the judge displayed partiality against the complainant during in-court consideration of a motion in litigation to which complainant is a party. There is no suggestion that the alleged episode is part of a pattern of partiality extending beyond the particular litigation.
The procedures complainant invokes are designed to provide an administrative remedy for misconduct of a judge for which no judicial remedy is available. A judicial remedy is available to deal with a claim that the impartiality of a judge assigned pending litigation may reasonably be questioned. See 28 U.S.C. § 455(a) (Supp.1978).
The complaint is therefore rejected as inappropriate for administrative processing.