Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. Andlaxmi Narayana Das, on Behalf of Themselves Andall International Society for Krishnaconsciousness Members,plaintiffs-appellants, v. John P. Collins, Chief of Airport Police, City of Houston,and Otis King, City Attorney, City of Houston,defendants-appellees
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. - 609 F.2d 151
Jan. 2, 1980
Barry A. Fisher, David Grosz, Beverly Hills, Cal., Woody & Rosen, Marian S. Rosen, Houston, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellants.
Joseph G. Rollins, Sr., Asst. City Atty., Houston, Tex., for defendants-appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas.
Before CHARLES CLARK, RONEY and HENDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
In this case, the district court denied attorney's fees to the prevailing party in International Society for Krishna Consciousness v. Collins, 452 F.Supp. 1007 (S.D.Tex.1977), on the sole ground that the plaintiffs did not come within the purview of the attorney's fee provision in 42 U.S.C.A. § 1988 because they are not penurious, and financial limitations have not been a detriment or an obstacle to the vindication of plaintiffs' legal rights.
Regardless of what the law might have been in 1977 when this order was entered, this Circuit has now clearly held that a plaintiff's ability to pay is not a "special circumstance" that would prohibit an award of attorney's fees under § 1988. Bunn v. Central Realty of Louisiana, 592 F.2d 891, 892 (5th Cir. 1979); Gore v. Turner, 563 F.2d 159, 163-164 (5th Cir. 1977).
The order denying attorney's fees is vacated and the case is remanded to the district court for a determination of attorney's fees in accordance with the law that has now developed under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1988. See Hutto v. Finney, 437 U.S. 678, 693-700, 98 S.Ct. 2565, 57 L.Ed.2d 522 (1978); Johnson v. Mississippi, 606 F.2d 635 (5th Cir. 1979); Iranian Students Ass'n v. Edwards, 604 F.2d 352, 353 (5th Cir. 1979); Concerned Democrats v. Reno, 601 F.2d 891, 892 (5th Cir. 1979); Dillon v. AFBIC Development Corp., 597 F.2d 556, 564 (5th Cir. 1979); Crowe v. Lucas, 595 F.2d 985, 993 (5th Cir. 1979); Criterion Club v. Board of Commissioners, 594 F.2d 118, 120 (5th Cir. 1979); Rainey v. Jackson State College, 591 F.2d 1002, 1003 (5th Cir. 1979); Morrow v. Dillard, 580 F.2d 1284, 1300 (5th Cir. 1978).
VACATED AND REMANDED.