Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google
Scholar
on the Web
Google Web
Search
MSN Web
Search
Yahoo! Web
Search
in the News
Google News
Search
Google News
Archive Search
Yahoo!
News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com
Search
Google Blog
Search
Technorati Blog
Search
in other Databases
Google Book
Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Enrique Ramirez, Jr., Defendant-appellant
- 612 F.2d 232
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas; Adrian A. Spears, Judge.
Enrique Ramirez, Jr., pro se.
LeRoy Morgan Jahn, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before GOLDBERG, RUBIN and POLITZ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
In these consolidated appeals the defendant attacks the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motions. In these motions the defendant raises various attacks on his prior convictions for possession and distribution of cocaine and heroin obtained by means of the defendant's guilty pleas. The defendant contends that these pleas were accepted in a manner which violated almost every provision of Fed.R.Crim.P. 11, that he was ineffectively represented by counsel in the presentation of these pleas, and that the magistrate below erred in not holding an evidentiary hearing with regard to his habeas petition.
Having liberally construed the defendant's pro se complaint, and after having carefully read the record, we find these claims to be devoid of merit, and we affirm.
AFFIRMED.