Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Fair Assessment in Real Estate Association, Inc.; David J.cassilly; Lynn F. Cassilly, Appellants, v. Gene Mcnary; William A. Skaggs; Edmund J. Pung; Charles T.schneider; Frank J. Antonio; Donald G. Williams;tom R. Otto; Stephen C. Snyder, Appellees
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. - 622 F.2d 415
Submitted June 11, 1980.Decided June 19, 1980
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri; John F. Nangle, Judge.
David J. Newburger, Newburger & Vossmeyer, St. Louis, Mo. (argued), and Susan Spiegel, St. Louis, Mo., on brief, for appellants.
Thomas W. Wehrle, St. Louis County Counselor, Clayton, Mo. (argued), and George W. Lang, II, Associate County Counselor, Clayton, Mo., on brief, for appellees, McNary, Skaggs, Antonio Pung and Schneider.
William F. Arnet, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Mo. (argued), for appellees, Williams, Otto and Snyder; John Ashcroft, Atty. Gen., and Michael L. Boicourt, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Mo., on brief.
Before LAY, Chief Judge, and HEANEY, BRIGHT, ROSS, STEPHENSON, HENLEY, McMILLIAN and ARNOLD, Circuit Judges, En Banc.
ORDER
The judgment of the district court is affirmed by an equally divided court en banc, 478 F.Supp. 1231. Chief Judge Lay and Judges Ross, McMillian and Arnold would reverse the judgment of the district court.