Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web
Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive
Search
Yahoo! News
Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com
Search
Google Blog
Search
Technorati Blog
Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellant, v. James Ray Ammons, Defendant-appellee
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. - 625 F.2d 130
Argued June 6, 1980.Decided July 8, 1980
James H. Barr, Asst. U. S. Atty., Scott Wendelsdorf, Louisville, Ky., for plaintiff-appellant.
Richard D. Heideman, Robert H. Zeman, Louisville, Ky., for defendant-appellee.
Before EDWARDS, Chief Judge, and CELEBREZZE and KENNEDY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
This is a very complicated fact dispute over whether or not a $5,000 cash appeal bond when released to defendant Ammons should be paid over to his attorney who had filed an assignment from Ammons to him to pay part of his attorney's fees, or should be released to the United States which subsequent to the assignment being filed had filed a claim for $5,000 to be applied to a fine which was part of defendant Ammons' sentence.
On consideration of this entire record, the judgment of the District Court which recognizes the validity of defendant Ammons' assignment to his attorney is hereby affirmed for the reasons set forth in the memorandum opinion of Judge Charles M. Allen entered September 22, 1977.