Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Robert J. Kuhn, Jose C. Davila, and Doyle E. Huckabee,defendants-appellants
- 638 F.2d 17
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas; William S. Sessions, Judge.
James Daniel (Jay) Doyle, III, Austin, Tex., for defendant-appellant Davilla.
Albert A. Pena, III, Corpus Christi, Tex., for defendant-appellant Huckabee.
Richard Witte Alexander, Austin, Tex., for defendant-appellant Kuhn.
LeRoy Morgan Jahn, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion Nov. 5, 1980, 5 Cir., 629 F.2d 1087)
Before GEE, RUBIN and RANDALL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
In our original opinion, we decided the merits of this attempted Abney1-type appeal on the assumption that we had jurisdiction to do so, expressly reserving that question. Since then it has been determined that we lack such jurisdiction. United States v. Becton, 632 F.2d 1294 (5th Cir. 1980). What we earlier wrote on the merits is therefore of no effect. We withdraw it. The appeal is
DISMISSED.
Abney v. United States, 431 U.S. 651, 97 S.Ct. 2034, 52 L.Ed.2d 651 (1977)