Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
United States Steel Corporation, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Gobel Mattingly, et al., Defendants.eugene E. Morris, Etc., Plaintiffs, v. Gobel Mattingly, et al., Defendants.bruce W. Christ, Respondent-appellant
United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. - 663 F.2d 68
Aug. 12, 1980
Lee Dale, Sherman & Howard, Denver, Colo., John R. McCall, Middleton & Reutlinger, Louisville, Ky., for United States Steel Corporation.
Joseph F. Dolan, U.S. Atty., C. Scott Crabtree, Asst. U.S. Atty., Denver, Colo., Leonard Schaitman, John C. Hoyle, Civil Division, Appellate Staff, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Benjamin Civiletti, Atty. Gen., Alice Daniel, Asst. Atty. Gen., William P. Arnold, David H. White, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C. for Bruce W. Christ.
Before BARRETT, BREITENSTEIN and DOYLE, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the motion of appellee, United States Steel Corporation, to vacate the order of this Court granting the government's motion for temporary stay of the order of the United States District Court compelling enforcement of a subpoena directed by United States Steel Corporation against appellant, Bruce W. Christ, an employee of the Bureau of Standards.
Upon consideration of the record, the briefs, and the oral arguments, we have concluded that the motion of United States Steel Corporation for vacation of our temporary stay must be denied and that the merits of this dispute are controlled by United States ex rel. Touhy v. Ragen, 340 U.S. 462, 71 S.Ct. 416, 95 L.Ed. 417 (1951) and Saunders v. The Great Western Sugar Company, 396 F.2d 794 (10th Cir. 1968). Thus, we hold that the District Court erred in enforcing the subpoena.
The judgment of the District Court, 89 F.R.D. 301, is reversed and the cause is remanded with directions to recall the subpoena and dismiss all proceedings with regard thereto.