Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
31 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 1793,32 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,846BURROUGHS CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Werner H. KRAMARSKY, As Commissioner of the New York StateDivision of Human Rights, Defendants-Appellants
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. - 666 F.2d 27
Originally Argued Sept. 25, 1980.Decided May 11, 1981.Petition for Rehearing filed June 9, 1981.Decided Nov. 24, 1981
Ann Thacher Anderson, Gen. Counsel, State Division of Human Rights, New York City, for defendants-appellants.
William E. McKnight, Shelby D. Green, Nixon, Hargrave, Devans & Doyle, Rochester, N. Y., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before MOORE and KEARSE, Circuit Judges, and TENNEY, District Judge.*
PER CURIAM:
For the reasons stated today in our opinion on rehearing in Delta Airlines, Inc. v. Kramarsky, 666 F.2d 21, we vacate our original decision on this appeal, reported at 650 F.2d 1308, holding that § 514(a) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1144(a) (1976), did not preempt New York's Human Rights Law, N.Y.Exec.Law § 296 (McKinney 1972 & Supp. 1980-1981).
The judgment of the district court enjoining enforcement of the Human Rights Law with respect to plaintiff's employee benefit plans is affirmed. For the reasons stated in our original opinion, plaintiff's claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is remanded for such further consideration as may be appropriate.