Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner, v. Marvin King, D/b/a C&m Leasing Company, et al., Respondents
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. - 671 F.2d 204
Feb. 17, 1982
Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Paul Bateman, N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
Thomas K. Campbell, Schaller, Schaller, Frost, Hostetter & Campbell, Newark, Ohio, John S. Compton, Worthington, Ohio, James S. Mowery, Jr., Columbus, Ohio, for respondents.
Before KEITH and MERRITT, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
ORDER
This case is before the court upon the application of the National Labor Relations Board to enforce its order against Franklin Fouts, d/b/a B & F Cartage, and Marvin King, d/b/a C & M Leasing Company, reported at 251 N.L.R.B. 645 (1980). Reference is made to the decision and order of the Board, dated August 27, 1980, for a recitation of pertinent facts.
Upon consideration, the court concludes that the decision of the Board is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. Universal Camera Corp. v. N.L.R.B., 340 U.S. 474, 71 S.Ct. 456, 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951).
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the order of the Board be and hereby is enforced. No costs are taxed. Each party will bear its own costs in this court.
Judge Phillips concurs in part and dissents in part. He would enforce the order of the Board in full against Franklin Fouts, d/b/a B & F Cartage; he would enforce all of the order against Marvin King, d/b/a C & M Leasing Company, except the requirement that Marvin F. King, d/b/a C & M Leasing Company, offer reinstatement to William Hutchinson and Leonard Messina to their former jobs with Franklin Fouts, d/b/a B & F Cartage, and make them whole for any loss of pay they may have suffered.