Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Margaret Louise Prince, Appellant, v. Town of Grubbs, Arkansas; Jackie Critcher, Billy L. Phiefer,larry King, and Frank Baker, Aldermen of Thegrubbs Town Council, Appellees
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. - 682 F.2d 184
Submitted June 14, 1982.Decided July 1, 1982
James A. McLarty, E. D. Pickens, Boyce, McLarty & Watson, Newport, Ark., for appellant.
G. Stanley Montgomery, Max O. Bowie, Newport, Ark., for appellees.
Before ARNOLD, Circuit Judge, MILLER,* Associate Judge, and COLLINSON,** Senior District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
Margaret Louise Prince appeals from an order of the District Court1 dismissing her 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 action against the town of Grubbs, Arkansas, and various aldermen of the Grubbs Town Council. Her claim was that she was fired from her job as the town garbage collector because of a statement she made which could have been construed as derogatory of the aldermen, and that she was thereby denied her right to free speech under the First and Fourteenth Amendments.
The District Court held a hearing on a motion for preliminary injunction, which was denied, and then, by agreement of counsel, the matter was submitted for consideration on the merits. Contrary to Mrs. Prince's contention, the District Court found that defendants dismissed her for legitimate reasons, including numerous complaints of unsatisfactory garbage pick-up service. We have reviewed the record and conclude that the findings of the District Court are not clearly erroneous. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a). Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.
The Hon. Elsijane Trimble Roy, United States District Judge for the Eastern and Western Districts of Arkansas