Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Marie Lucie Jean, et al., Plaintiffs,lucien Louis, et al., Plaintiffs-appellees,miami Daily News, et al., Intervenors-appellants, v. Alan C. Nelson, et al., Defendants-appellants, Cross-appellees
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. - 683 F.2d 1311
July 13, 1982
Rudolph W. Giuliani, Assoc. Atty. Gen., U. S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for defendants-appellants, cross-appellees.
Kurzban & Kurzban, P. A., Ira J. Kurzban, Michael J. Rosen, Miami, Fla., Bruce Winick, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Florida, Inc., Coral Gables, Fla., for plaintiffs-appellees.
John Kendrick Tucker, Deputy Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Fla., for intervenor-appellant State.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida.
Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, and HATCHETT and CLARK, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
The United States has moved for a partial stay of the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida entered June 29, 1982. Hearing and briefing have been expedited, and the Court has heard oral argument and has considered the briefs.
To justify granting the partial stay the United States would be required to show that the following circumstances exist: (1) likelihood of ultimate success on appeal; (2) irreparable injury to the government; (3) granting the stay will not substantially harm plaintiffs; and (4) the public interest will be served by the partial stay.
The government has not been able to show that any one or more of these circumstances exist.
The motion for partial stay is DENIED.
The case is expedited for hearing on an early oral argument calendar.