Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
William Rice Lummis, Texas Temporary Administrator of Theestate of Howard R. Hughes, Jr., Deceased,plaintiff-appellant, Cross Appellee, v. Mark White, Bob Bullock, Kenneth Cory, H. B. Alvord, et al.,defendants-appellees.kenneth Cory, H. B. Alvord, Defendants-appellees, Cross Appellants
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.* - 686 F.2d 225
Aug. 26, 1982
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas; Jack Roberts, Judge.
Andrews & Kurth, O. Clayton Lilienstern, Houston, Tex., Graves, Dougherty, Hearon, Moody & Garwood, R. James George, Jr., Austin, Tex., James W. Moore, New Haven, Conn., for plaintiff-appellant, cross appellee.
Paul J. Van Osselaer, Austin, Tex., M. Carr Ferguson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tax Div., Dept. of Justice, Gilbert E. Andrews, Chief, Appellate Section, Richard Farber, Atty., Washington, D. C., Brown, Maroney, Rose, Baker & Barber, Charlie D. Dye, Austin, Tex., Jerome B. Falk, Steven L. Mayer, Jerome B. Falk, Jr., San Francisco, Cal., Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Ronald E. Gother, Los Angeles, Cal., McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, Rick Harrison, Austin, Tex., Clark, Thomas, Winters & Shapiro, Donald S. Thomas, Austin, Tex., for defendants-appellees.
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Before VANCE and FRANK D. JOHNSON, Jr., Circuit Judges, and THOMAS,** District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
The Supreme Court, --- U.S. ----, 102 S.Ct. 2325, 72 L.Ed.2d 694, having held that the eleventh amendment bars the statutory interpleader sought in this case, the judgment of the district court, 491 F.Supp. 5, dismissing the action is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.