Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
29 Fair Empl.prac.cas. 1442,30 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,125mariano S. Falcon, Plaintiff-appellee Cross-appellant, v. General Telephone Company of the Southwest,defendant-appellant Cross-appellee
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.* - 686 F.2d 261
Sept. 20, 1982
E. Russell Nunnally, Dallas, Tex., Stephen W. Holt, San Angelo, Tex., for defendant-appellant cross-appellee.
John E. Collins, Irving, Tex., Frank P. Hernandez, Garland, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee cross-appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Sarah Tilghman Hughes, Judge.
Before TUTTLE, RANDALL and TATE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of this Court, affirming the certification order of the trial court, 647 F.2d 633 (5th Cir. 1981), having been reversed by the Supreme Court and the case having been "remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion" --- U.S. ----, 102 S.Ct. 2364, 72 L.Ed.2d 740 (1982), this case is now remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion of the Supreme Court, and with the earlier opinion of the Court, 450 U.S. 1036, 101 S.Ct. 1752, 68 L.Ed.2d 234 (1981). We reinstate such parts of our original opinion in Falcon v. General Telephone Co. of the Southwest, 626 F.2d 369 (5th Cir. 1980), as are not affected by these two decisions of the Supreme Court.