Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
In the Matter of Braniff Airways, Inc., et al., Debtor.braniff Airways, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-appellees, v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Defendant,american Airlines, Inc., Intervenor-appellant
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. - 700 F.2d 214
Feb. 28, 1983
Ronald S. Orr, David H. Kennedy, Los Angeles, Cal., Stephen L. Taylor, Dallas Fort Worth Airport, Tex., for intervenor-appellant.
Kent Kibbie, Fort Worth, Tex., for Bank of New York, etc.
David Bonderman, Washington, D.C., Daniel C. Stewart, Dallas, Tex., for Braniff.
Robert J. White, Los Angeles, Cal., for Pacific Southwest Airlines.
John R. Blinn, Stephen A. Goodwin, Fort Worth, Tex., for amicus curiae Secured Bank Lenders to Braniff Airways.
Eloise E. Davies, Civ. Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for amicus curiae U.S.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas.
Before GEE, GARZA and POLITZ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
We affirm the judgment of the District Court, essentially for the reasons stated in its memorandum opinion. We add, in particular, that we conclude that 28 United States Code Secs. 1471(a) and (b) were not invalidated by the Marathon decision,1 but if they were, nevertheless, the jurisdictional grant of 28 United States Code Sec. 1334 remains effective during the transitional period.
AFFIRMED.
The Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipeline Co., --- U.S. ----, 102 S.Ct. 2858, 73 L.Ed.2d 598 (1982)