Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
First Federal Savings & Loan Association of Detroit,plaintiff-appellant, v. William David Lustig, et al., Defendants-appelleesfirst Federal Savings & Loan Association of Lenawee County,plaintiff-appellant, v. Patricia K. Fischer, et al., Defendants-appellees
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. - 702 F.2d 92
Feb. 23, 1983
Roger K. Timm, Joanne R. Lax, Detroit, Mich., for plaintiff-appellant.
Harvey A. Koselka, Adrian, Mich., for defendants-appellees in No. 80-1748.
Paul A. Longton, Wyandotte, Mich., for defendants-appellees in No. 80-1754.
Before WEICK and BROWN, Senior Circuit Judges, and PORTER, Senior District Judge.*
ORDER DENYING PETITION TO REHEAR
On receipt and consideration of a petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc in the above styled cases; and
No judge in active service in this court having moved for rehearing en banc and the motion therefore having been referred to the panel which heard the case; and
The panel having noted nothing of substance in said motion for rehearing which had not been carefully considered before issuance of the court's opinion.
Now, therefore, it is ORDERED that the motion for rehearing be and the same is hereby denied.
Judge Weick dissents from this order denying the petition to rehear and would grant the petition for the reasons set out in his dissent from the per curiam opinion entered in this case. 687 F.2d 143 (6th Cir.1982).