Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
James E. Lowe and Rose Lowe, Appellants, v. Coolidge Conlee, Sheriff of St. Francis County, Arkansas, Appellee,anddwight Tosh, Sergeant of the Arkansas State Police, Appellee
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. - 751 F.2d 310
Jan. 2, 1985
Richard E. Steck, Steck & Schofield, Chicago, Ill., Charles P. Allen, West Helena, Ark., for appellants.
Fletcher Long, Jr., Forrest City, Ark., for appellee Conlee.
Steve Clark, Atty. Gen., J. Cullum, Little Rock, Ark., for appellee Tosh.
Before LAY, Chief Judge, and ROSS and FAGG, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
On September 11, 1984, this court filed an opinion in this case reversing the district court's grant of judgment notwithstanding the verdicts. We also retained jurisdiction and remanded to the district court for a ruling on Tosh's and Conlee's new trial motions. 742 F.2d 1140. The district court was instructed to certify its ruling on the new trial motions to this court and a party adversely affected by the district court's ruling was given fifteen days from the date of certification to file a supplemental brief with this court.
The district court has denied Tosh's and Conlee's motions for new trial. It certified its ruling to this court on November 16, 1984, and Tosh and Conlee have not filed supplemental briefs with this court contesting the district court's ruling. We affirm the district court's denial of Tosh's and Conlee's motions for new trial.