Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com
Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
United States of America, Appellee, v. John Quincy Harris, Appellant
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. - 755 F.2d 127
Submitted Feb. 7, 1985.Decided Feb. 19, 1985
John Quincy Harris, pro se.
Thomas E. Dittmeier, U.S. Atty., St. Louis, Mo., for appellee.
Before HEANEY, FAGG and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
John Quincy Harris was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. App. Sec. 1202(a)(1). The maximum penalty for this offense was two years. Shortly after the finding of guilty, the government filed an allegation that the defendant was a special dangerous offender. After a hearing, the district court entered a written order and memorandum finding that the defendant was a special and dangerous offender under the provisions of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3575, and sentenced him to a term of six years.
The defendant on appeal contends (1) that the court failed to state adequately its reasons for finding him a special dangerous offender, and (2) that the sentence imposed was disproportionate in severity to the maximum term otherwise authorized by law for the crime committed. We find no merit to either contention, and affirm on the basis of the district court's unpublished opinion. See United States v. Thornley, 733 F.2d 970, 972 (1st Cir.1984) (seven-year enhanced sentence approved on showing of stated reasons for sentence); United States v. Cox, 719 F.2d 285, 286-87 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 1714, 80 L.Ed.2d 186 (1984) (six-year enhancement approved); United States v. Davis, 710 F.2d 104, 109-10 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 505, 78 L.Ed.2d 695 (1983) (twelve-year enhanced sentence approved with reference to defendant's record); United States v. Harris, 703 F.2d 508, 509 (11th Cir.1983) (ten-year enhanced sentence not challenged).
Affirmed pursuant to 8th Cir.R. 14.